Wednesday, April 13, 2011

The Regulative Principle of Family

The Regulative Principle of Family
by Lisa Moyer, Home School Graduate from Geneva Illinois
April 12, 2011

The regulative principle is most often applied to formal worship. It is used to determine the format of church services, allowing only those things that God has authorized for worship, including prayer, reading of the Word, preaching, singing, and the sacraments. The regulative principle is in essence a call for “sola Scriptura,” or Scripture alone. It defends the Bible as complete and authoritative. In the same way water is everything needed to quench thirst, so God's Word is all that is needed for godly life and righteousness. “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (II Timothy 3:16-17, NKJV). The regulative principle applies to the family in a significant way. It is important to understand what the regulative principle is, how it applies to family, and the impacts of this application.

The Bible, and what can be deduced from its principles, is to regulate our lives. It even gives instruction for how to carry out seemingly neutral activities. The law which God provides in the Bible is comprehensive, lacking no clarity or thoroughness. No bright idea from mankind can in any way enhance or add to His completely sufficient statutes. Dr. Joe Morecraft writes, “Biblical law is so perfect and comprehensive...that any alteration, supplementation, or amendment of would be an arrogant assault by sinful man on the majestic sovereignty of the triune God” (Morecraft, 79).

The “alteration” Morecraft refers to can be adding regulations to the Bible or excluding parts of Scripture from application. Although worship is often regulated by more specific regulations in the Bible, all of life is to be lived according to His principles. The heart and foundation of the regulative principle, that Scripture must not be added to or taken from, applies to everything. Because this is its core, it is a principle that effects all areas of life and institutions, including the family.

The “regulative principle of family” is especially significant as the family is the foundational unit of society. Thomas Manton noted the significance of the family:

“Religion was first hatched in families, and there the devil seeketh to crush it; the families of the Patriarchs were all the Churches God had in the world for the time; and therefore, (I suppose,) when Cain went out from Adam's family, he is said to go out from the face of the Lord, Gen. 4:16. Now, the devil knoweth that this is a blow at the root, and a ready way to prevent the succession of Churches: if he can subvert families, other societies and communities will not long flourish and subsist with any power and vigor; for there is the stock from whence they are supplied both for the present and future” (Manton).

The ways this application takes effect are numerous, but one of the most foundational is that of training children. Scripture contains all the instructions needed for raising a family and educating children. Of course, this is not to say that no textbooks are needed for learning math or that work experience is not helpful for building character. For example, rather than the idea that the Bible teaches the historical events that occurred in 1861, it is the concept that God has revealed how we are to view, interpret, and respond to history. God has showed that the education of children is a responsibility delegated to parents. In the same way that God's worship has never been delegated to human authority, so the training of sons and daughters has never been delegated to any institution outside the family.

The book of Proverbs illustrates the instruction and wisdom that passes from a father directly to his children. “Hear, my children, the instruction of a father, and give attention to know understanding” (Proverbs 4:1). In Deuteronomy 4:10, the Lord says: “Gather the people to Me, and I will let them hear My words, that they may learn to fear Me all the days they live on the earth, and that they may teach their children.” He says again, “And these words which I command you today shall be in your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up” (Deuteronomy 6:6). To apply the heart of the regulative principle to the training of children is to not add to or take away from the clear responsibility given to parents for their children's training.

The impacts of applying the regulative principle to families and the discipleship of sons and daughters are significant. The way a child is educated influences their entire life, especially the religious perspective their education takes on. Robert Booth commented, “It is not a matter of whether our children will be taught religion in school; it is only a matter of which religion they will be taught.” Rather than taking away from the Word of God by transferring the distinctly religious education of children to the state, God's revelation shows that mothers and fathers are given the role of their children's education.

Parents are to ensure that their children receive a Biblical worldview, knowledge of God, and the truth of the Scriptures. While outside mentors, teachers, or resources may be helpful in assisting the development of understanding in children, the responsibility continues to rest on the mother and father. To expect an age-segregated children's Sunday school class, for instance, to teach one's son all he needs to know about the Bible and how it is to be lived out, would be shifting the role of parent to a Sunday school teacher. Since God has never presented a teacher with the obligation He gives to parents, it would be altering His Word to make that transfer ourselves. Parents are to be involved in teaching their children truths of Scripture.

Another implication is that education would involve discipleship. Noah Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines “disciple” as, “To teach; to train, or bring up.” As God has given parents the role of teaching their children the Lord's commands, education involves more than a memorization of facts. It is an unceasing passing on of the Christian faith (Deuteronomy 4). This affects the religious perspective that children are educated with. Scott Brown writes, “[John] Calvin recognized the supreme importance of the father's role in the discipleship of children... In contrast to our own age where parents are content to systematically outsource their children's education, Calvin knew that it was the primary responsibility of the home” (Brown, 179). More than a knowledge of subject matter, the Lord requires that parents teach their children to “keep His statutes and His commandments which I command you today, that it may go well with you and with your children after you” (Deuteronomy 4:40). Discipleship, or training in God’s Word, is a necessary part of education.

Although the regulative principle is typically applied to worship only, the regulative principle in essence is to not take away from or add to God's Word. It is a principle that calls us to look to God’s Word alone for how we are to live our lives. The impact it has when applied to the family is important as it addresses the responsibility for education. Greg Price wrote, ”Is God’s Word adequate and complete in giving to man all that man needs to know as to how he must please God? Absolutely...” The Bible shows us everything we need to live a life pleasing to Him, which includes the responsibility of education.

Works Cited

Booth, Robert. "Schools are Religious." Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics. 31 Mar 2011.
Brown, Scott. Family Reformation: The Legacy of Sola Scriptura in Calvin's Geneva. Wake Forest, VA: Merchant Adventures, 2009.
Manton, Thomas. "Mr. Thomas Manton's Epistle to the Reader." Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics. 31 Mar 2011.
Morecraft, Joe. How God Wants Us to Worship Him: A Defense of the Bible as the Only Standard for Modern Worship. San Antonio, TX: The Vision Forum, 2004.
Price, Greg. "The Regulative Principle of Worship." Foundation for Reformation. 7 Apr 2011.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Linked In or Reputation Based Networks Could Replace Accreditation and Degrees

The debate video below has some helpful points on self learning at the college level. It is interesting that accreditation and degrees could also be replaced with LinkedIn Profiles and other relationship based networks. The idea of peer based open transparent accreditation is simply proving what you know with a portfolio and references. The accreditation portion of the video begins at 39:40. The lady speaking is Anya Kamenetz who wrote the book titled, "DYI U: Edupunks, Edupreneurs and the Coming Transformation of Higher Education." Neither of the speakers are Christians, the second speaker is defending the tradiational university model.







How Should the University Evolve?, part 1 of 2 from BLSCI on Vimeo.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Loving Your Wife

Here's few suggestions for loving your wife. See if she agrees.

Spend time with her
Pray with her
Pray for her
Lead her in family worship
Read to her
Listen to her talk, saying uh-huh at least once every 5 min
Talk to her – except when she’s talking.
Go first when you’ve arrived late and the only open seats are in the front row
Fix her appliances
Labor for her food, clothing, and shelter
Be the first to seek forgiveness when estranged
Instruct her in the Scriptures
Study her – her likes & dislikes, strengths & weaknesses
Dwell with her in an understanding way
Hold her
Sleep with her
Make decisions
Make decisions in her best interest
Walk between her and the road
Defend her good name and honor
Laugh with her, never at her.
Have a vision
Communicate your vision to her
Utilize her talents
Don’t push her buttons
Buy her gifts
Encourage her
Thank her for her labors
Clean your plate – even the mistakes
Kiss her on first arriving home
Kiss her goodbye
Buy her the best tools
Ensure she takes care of herself
Protect her
Confide in her
Seek her advice
Fire the people that need fired
Cover her faults
Teach her graciously
Preserve her authority
Uphold her lawful government
Correct her unwise government
Confess your sins against her
Lead her with wisdom
Rule with diligence
Be jealous of her time & love
Put your dirty laundry in the laundry – if it always misses, buy her a bigger basket
Desire her body
Receive her attention and affection
Change the flat tire on her car
Open her car door
Tell her you love her
Smile at her
Walk hand in hand in public
Praise her labor
Delight in all that is her
Be the HUSBANDman of her garden

Monday, February 22, 2010

A Case for Calculus on the Farm

For those of you who like mathematics, consider how calculus could benefit any small farm or business. It would improve the quality and profitability of the operations. On our farm, we could watch more details, collect more data, understand the data more thoroughly with algebraic equations, and then optimize the variables for cost and quality with simple calculus. A slow implementation of these ideas is reasonable and also a beautiful implementation of the Biblical view of mathematics, diligence, and excellence.


The inventor of Calculus, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) home schooled himself in math under a mentor after becoming a lawyer. The driving force behind his work was his view that God made the world in the best way it could have been made. Voltaire wrote a popular cartoon which criticized Leibniz on this optimism, focusing on the pain and suffering in the world. In his book titled, Theodicy, Leibniz wrote on the goodness of God, the freedom of man and the origin of evil, and the conformity of faith with reason. He was “incapable of looking at the objects of any special enquiry without seeing them as aspects or parts of one intelligible universe.” Leibniz thought of God as a mathematician. “He conceives God in the creation of the world like a mathematician who is solving a minimum problem – the question being to determine among an infinite number of possible worlds, that for which the sum of necessary evil is a minimum.”


Leibniz never married and was busy making major contributions to the world of mathematics, physics, social science and theology, but he wasn’t perfect. He wrote, “I cannot tell you how extraordinarily distracted and spread out I am. I am trying to find various things in the archives; I look at old papers and hunt up unpublished documents. From these I hope to shed some light on the history of the [House of] Brunswick. I receive and answer a huge number of letters. At the same time, I have so many mathematical results, philosophical thoughts, and other literary innovations that should not be allowed to vanish that I often do not know where to begin.” Sounds like a home school and perhaps a sign of greatness!


So just how could calculus be helpful on a small farm or any business, and worth studying? Here is a simple example. Based on our farm data, for us to grow x broiler chickens, it costs C = $862 + $6.67x. The derivative of this equation (the slope of the line) shows that the feed and labor cost for each additional boiler chicken is $6.67. That was calculus.


Business profit equals the income minus the costs or P(x) = I(x) – C(x) = $10x – ($862 +$6.67x). Since this is a linear equation, increasing sales and lowering costs are the ways to maximize profits. Looking at the slope of this line, dP(x)/dx = $10-$6.67 = $3.33. This is the business income per chicken after all expenses including labor are paid. That was calculus again. Collecting more precise data would require non-linear equations, which then could be optimized using simple calculus techniques. Unknowns (U) and acts of God (A) can be factored into the equations using Proverbs 16:9 “A man’s heart deviseth his way; but the Lord directeth his steps” (U+A).


How much more money might be earned or saved if we did use calculus on the farm? I estimate the increase in earnings is the difference between the linear equation and non-linear equation of y = x and y = x1.05 In practical terms, that would lead us to sell 800 chickens where we would have sold 600 or 1400 chickens where we would have sold 1000 chickens, with the corresponding increased profit. In other terms, the breakeven point for a course in calculus would be equal to the business profit from 129 chickens, which would take two months to raise by a hired hand, with a return on investment over 5 years of $6000, at 1400 broilers per year, as compared to the profit earned without applying calculus. Therefore, it is a financial advantage to learn and apply calculus to every day business, just as we would expect, since God created the universe with mathematical order and it is our honour to search that out and put that knowledge to work.

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings to search out a matter. Proverbs 25:2


"Mathematics is the alphabet with which God has written the universe." Galileo Galilei


For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. Col 1:15-17


I mentioned the profitability of calculus to my chicken farming 18 year old son and he thought that it would be worth hiring an industrial engineer to do the calculus for him! A good idea, but not as satisfying as thinking some of God’s mathematical thoughts after him, experiencing a touch of His excellence, and seeing the increase result from His hand. Perhaps this deeper appreciation is like the difference between buying eggs and producing your own eggs. The gain is also in knowledge, wisdom, and understanding of how to acknowledge God in more of the details.


James Bartlett is the Executive Director of the North Dakota Home School Association and the Biblical Concourse of Home Universities. He teaches “Calculus That Only Christians Can Do” for the Concourse, the New Geneva Christian Leadership Academy, and the Newton Institute for the Reformation of Science and Engineering. He and his wife Lynn home school three boys and home college one son on a small farm in the Turtle Mountains. They can be reached at 701-263-4574. Lynn blogs about their family activities at http://NDHomekeeper.blogspot.com

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

In the summer of 1969 Professor Percy Graves, a close friend and student of Professor Ludwig von Mises, gave a series of 7 lectures in Buenos Aires to overflow crowds at the Centro de Estudios sobre la Libertad on the dollar crisis. One of those lecutures dealt with the specifics of the 1929 Depression in some detail. Apparently there were Argentinians concerned enough about that crisis that they were willing to invest 7 nights of their life so as not to repeat that economic calamity in their country.

Would that Americans were so inclined.

The great irony is that if one changed 1929 to 2009 and added 80 years to the other dates, Professor Graves could have given the same lecture today word for word and been right on the mark. The only difference at this point is that we don't yet have the diaries and papers of the key players of the 2009 crisis.

The biggest and most dangerous misunderstanding regarding both of these economic crises is that they somehow represent a failure of the free market instead of the failure of government management of the economy.

Mises was once asked by a graduate student at his University of New York seminar what he thought the government should do during a depression. Mises replied in his quiet manner by presenting his free market position in a few well chosen words. Aghast, the student replied, "You mean the government should do nothing?"
Mises leaned back as he frequently did and said, "Yes, but I mean the government should start doing nothing much sooner."

You can download a transcript of the entire lecture at Understanding the Dollar Crisis

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Third Party Voting & The Lesser of Two Evils

The intramural debate among Christians over third party candidates is underway once again. When I first voted outside the Demoblican party, I don’t remember any serious discussions about such things among Christians. Their response to my third party comments, if there was any at all, was simply, “Huh ???”

But over the 6 intervening presidential election cycles the debate has matured considerably. Now I hear Christians contemplating complicated electioneering strategies (like switching parties to vote for the other party’s worst candidate in the primary in the hope they will win the nomination and set up an easier race in the fall) or asserting that a vote for a good third party candidate is really a vote for the worst candidate. To which my response was, “Huh???”

So in an effort to catch up to my more articulate brothers and sisters on this quadrenially important topic, I sat down yesterday, after spending the day painting a large sign for my favorite candidate which will be mounted on the main traffic artery through our town, and tried to improve my contribution to this discussion.

On voting for the candidate who can’t win …

  • Elections are not a horse race where voters try to pick the winning ticket.

  • Elections are a wheelbarrow race where voters make the winner.

  • Not voting for a good candidate because he is not expected to win is giving up before the
    wheelbarrow race is over.

  • Choosing the lesser-of-two-evils over a good candidate because no else is voting for him is being controlled by peer pressure like a junior high socialite.

On voting for the lesser of two evils …

  • If you vote for the lesser of two evils for President, you’ll always have an evil President.
  • You can’t expect God to provide you with a good President when you vote for an evil one any more than you can expect God to provide you with daily bread when you sleep all day instead of working.

  • Voting for the lesser of two evils disobeys the admonition in Exodus 18:21 to choose good men (i.e. able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness) to exercise civil rule.
  • A vote for the lesser of two evils is doing evil in the hope of stopping evil.
  • A vote for the lesser of two evils is a wasted vote in getting a good candidate elected.
  • Voting for the lesser of two evils in the hope of avoiding a greater evil is like stealing food in order not to starve.
  • Defining an election in terms of the lesser of two evils is like falling for the false dilemma of values clarification exercises where 5 people are stranded in a lifeboat with supplies for 4 and thinking that one person should be thrown overboard (regrettably, of course) in order to keep the other 4 alive.
  • Voting for a good candidate instead of the lesser of two evils is not a vote for the greater of two evils, anymore than keeping 5 stranded people on a lifeboat for 4 is choosing to kill 5 people.

A vote for a good candidate is, as should be obvious, simply a vote for a good candidate.


Of course, I suspect the real issue is that lesser-of-two-evil voters do not really believe they are choosing the lesser to two evils. They believe they are choosing a basically good candidate who, while qualified for office, is simply not everything they might desire in an ideal candidate. ...
Read more

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Faith and the Banking Crisis

Should bad private banking decisions be paid for with your tax dollars? According to a recent Rasmussen survey, 25% of Americans think so. Does the Bible, as the timeless, cultureless, foundation of absolute truth and pure wisdom, have any insights regarding money and banking, debt and taxes that might help us know what is right and wrong in this situation? It sure does, here is a taste of these insights:
Thou shalt not steal (Exodus 20:15) does apply to the situation where the government takes from one taxpayer and gives it to benefit someone else, such as private bankers, and is condemned as stealing and wrong.

Thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow (Deut 28:12) is a promised blessing to people and nations who obey God. The Federal Reserve System has been creating money as debt since 1914, when congress transferred the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof to the FRS (US Constitution, Article 1:8). North Dakota also stopped using constitutional (biblical) money when it left Article 1:10, “No state shall.. make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts. As a result of not obeying God (or the Constitution) in our monetary policy, we now have a group of independent international bankers manipulating the value of our money using “confidence” rather than real tangible value. When the bankers print 10% more money, inflation goes up by 10%. Real inflation is now at 12% and aimed toward 16% in 9 months based on the M3 money supply. Inflation is a hidden tax and is stealing our economic liberty.

This is an abomination to the Lord according to Proverbs 11:1 which states that A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight. The price for a pound of chicken would only vary according to the market forces, not the unjust devaluing of our currency in the Biblically and Constitutionally sound money system that we once had.

Forced taxation at a rate more than voluntary giving to God (i.e.,tithe of 10%, Malachi 3:8) finances the government to usurp the role of God and the church in areas such as helping those in need. Using tax money to bail out international banks means there will be less money for charitable giving, as well as less capital to grow businesses.

Reading the timeless wisdom of the Bible in light of current affairs can both help find the root of our finanical problems and point to a solution, even if those solutions can only be implemented slowly and incrementally. At least we can know what is right and wrong as we watch the present financial circus!